APHC010386852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7881/2025 Between: 1. A GIDDAIAH, S/O A YELLAIAH AGED 40 YEARS, OCC MPDO KOTHAPALLI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATI. 2. DAMAN SURESH, S/O. D.AMBANNA AGE 49 YEARS, R/O H.NO 5/137, TELUGU STREET, GUDUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High CourtPleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused 3 in CC No 24 of 2023 on the file of the Honble SPL Judge for Trial of SPE and ACB cases at Kurnool and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings against the petitioner in CC No 24 of 2023 on the file of the Honble SPL judge for Trial of SPE and ACB cases at Kurnool and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. S.SYAM SUNDER RAO SC cum Spl P.P. For ACB 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.1, seeking quashment of proceedings against him in C.C.No.24 of 2019, on the file of Special Judge for Trial of SPE & ACB cases, Kurnool. 2. Heard Sri V.Vinod K Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing the presence of the Petitioner before the trial Court on every adjournment. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court, unless his presence is specifically directed by the trial Court. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions before the trial Court in his defence. The learned trial Judge may appreciate the same and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stands closed. Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA,J Date: 29.07.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 38 Crl.P.No.7881 of 2025 Dt.29.07.2025 MH