Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2732 (KAR)

SHRI KAYANANAVAR PUTRAPPA ALIYAS PUTRESH K., v. SMT. L. KAVITABAI ALIYAS KAVITA

CRL.P/100105/2023 · 2025-01-24

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1380 CRL.P No. 100105 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100105 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI. KAYANANAVAR PUTRAPPA @ PUTRESH K. S/O. NINGAPPA, AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.5/481, 5TH WARD, NEW AK COLONY, HOOVINHADAGALI, TQ. H.HADAGALI, DIST. BALLARI-583219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. L.KAVITABAI @ KAVITA FALSELY CLAIMING TO BE THE WIFE OF K. PUTRESH, AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. 17TH WARD, HONNUR-RAJWAL ROAD, HOOVINAHADAGALI TOWN, TQ. HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST. BALLARI-583219. 2. MISS L.DIVYA FALSELY CLAIMING TO BE THE DAUGHTER OF K. PUTRESH, AGE. MINOR, OCC. NIL/STUDENT, R/O. 17TH WARD, HONNUR-RAJWAL ROAD, HOOVINAHADAGALI TOWN, TQ. HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST. BALLARI-583219, SINCE MINOR R/BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, R1 R/O. 17TH WARD, HONNUR-RAJWAL ROAD, HOOVINAHADAGALI TOWN, TQ. HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST. BALLARI-583219, …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S.KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE) B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.01.27 16:35:00 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1380 CRL.P No. 100105 of 2023 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.482 OF CR.P.C. IS SEEKING TO, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.12.2022 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOOVINAHADAGALI, IN CRL.MISC NO.449/2018 ON THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS U/S 45 OF THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petition does not survive for consideration since the main proceedings before the Trial Court have been concluded. Submission is placed on record. The petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE KMS Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60