APHC010006892015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1145 OF 2015 Between: 1. MATTA BASAVA NAGARJUNA RAO, S/O. LATE RANGA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, AQUA CULTURE, R/O PEDATHUMMIDI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SUDEENA SRINIVAS, S/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O DOSAKAYALAPUDI, KODURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF A.P, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & A.P. HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order in Crl.M.P.No. 310 of 2014 in Crl. Appeal No.144 of 2011 dated 21-04-2015 on the file of the Court of the X Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Krishna, at Machilipatnam consequently allow Petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1828 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant stay of all further proceedings in Crl. Appeal No.144 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the X Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Krishna, at Machilipatnam pending disposal of the above Revision Case and pass other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 21.04.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2014 in Crl.A.No.144 of 2011 on the file of learned X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, wherein the petition filed under Section 391 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner herein seeking to receive the document as additional evidence and the same is dismissed. 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 21.04.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2014 in Crl.A.No.144 of 2011. The Crl.M.P.No.310 of 2014 is filed by the petitioner herein seeking to receive the document as additional evidence and the said petition is dismissed. Against the said orders, the present revision is preferred. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to his instructions, the Crl.A.No.144 of 2011 was disposed on 30.01.2024. 5. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the disposal of main Crl.A.No.144 of 2011 on 30.01.2024 as 3 the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 25.09.2025 MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1145 of 2015 Date: 25.09.2025 MS