APHC010387002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2326/2025 Between: 1. KOLLI SATYAVANI, W/O. KANAKA RAJU, AGED ABOUT42 YEARS, R/O. NGOS COLONY, KAPPARADA, VISAKHPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR K KURMANADH, S/O. LATE LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. D NO. 8-1-97/2, PEDAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. POLAVARAPU POORNA VENKATA PRASAD, S/O. NOOKA RAJU LATE, AGED 52 YEARS, D NO. 8-2-3, PEDAWALTIR, VISAKHPATNAM 30 003 3. POLAVARAPU SEKHAR, S/O. NOOKA RAJU LATE, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. D NO. 8-2-3, PEDAWALTIR, VISAKHPATNAM 30 003 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to call for the records relating order and decree Dated 25.3.2025 passed in EA No. 932/2024 in EP No. 45/2023 in OS No. 408/2012on the file of Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam and examine its legal, or propriety and correctness of the same and consequently set aside the same by allowing the revision in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in EP No. 45/2023 in OS No. 408/2012 on the file of Principal District Judge, Vishakapatnam pending disposal of the above CRP in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALEEMULLA S 2. The Court made the following order: Heard Sri T. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition with liberty to approach the Executing Court under the relevant provisions by filing a claim petition. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, if permissible under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 19.09.2025 MJA 633 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2326/2025 19.09.2025 MJA