APHC010387082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19576/2025 Between: 1. GORLA UDAYA BHASKAR, S/O. SWAMYDASU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-12, HARIJANAWADA, PATURU VILLAGE, NANDALUR MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRCT, KADAPA 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA RURAL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering and passing orders on Petitioner Mee Seva Application vide No.TTAOl 2200098737, dt.28.10.2022 followed by Spandana Application vide Spandana Request No.KDP20230925179, dt.25.9.2023, wherein the Petitioner sought for deletion of the land an extent of Ac.3.20 cents in 2 Sy.No.1010/1 of Chinna Chowk Village, Kadapa Rural Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the prohibited properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of the Order, dt.1.12.2022 passed in W.P.No.38931/2022 and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to forthwith consider and pass appropriate orders on Petitioners Mee Seva Application Vide No.TTAOl 2200098737, dt.28.10.2022 and Spandana Application vide Spandana Request NO.KDP20230925179, dt.25.9.2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Petitioner’s Mee Seva Application vide TTA012200098737 , dt.28.10.2022 followed by Spandana Application vide Spandana Request NO.KDP20230925179, dt.25.9.2023 for deletion of the land an extent of Ac.3.20 cents in Sy.No.1010/1 of Chinna Chowk Village, Kadapa Rural Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the prohibited properties list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri Shravan W V B, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of an extent of Ac.3-20 cents in Sy.No.1010/1 of Chinna Chowk Village, Kadapa Rural Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, succeeded the property by inheritance. The property referred to supra was kept under the list 3 of Prohibited Properties under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short “the Act”). The petitioner made an application online on 28.10.2022, complaining of non-disposal of the application dated 28.10.2022, the petitioner filed a W.P.No.38931 of 2022. The said writ petition was disposed of on 01.12.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner applied in the Spandana programme vide request No.KDP20230925179, dated 25.09.2023 (Ex.P.4). However, the same was not considered. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted the instructions of the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar. Along with the instructions, the proceedings of the learned District Collector vide R.Dis.No.E5/POT/81/2022, dated 17.06.2023, and the endorsement vide Rc.D2/1510/23, dated 12.10.2023, are annexed. The copy of the endorsement is handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 4. On perusal of the endorsement, it would indicate that the application made by the petitioner seeking deletion of the properties (referred supra), the District Collector passed an order vide R.Dis.No.E5/POT/81/2022 dated 17.06.2023. The Tahsildar also issued an endorsement to Ex.P.4 Spandana application vide Rc.No. D2/1510/2023, dated 12.10.2023. 5. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will take appropriate steps regarding the order passed by the District Collector dated 17.06.2023 and the endorsement of the Tahsildar dated 12.10.2023. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. 4 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the District Collector dated 17.06.2023 and the Endorsement of the Tahsildar dated 12.10.2023, if the petitioner is aggrieved. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 01.08.2025 KA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19576/2025 Date:01.08.2025 KA