Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2731 (JHR)

Chinta Mani Sheel v. Education

WPC/9/2018 · 2025-08-28

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25778 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 9 of 2018 --------- Chinta Mani Sheel, s/o Late Kali Pada Lauha, r/o Kusum Vihar, P.O-BCCL Township, Koyla Nagar, P.S-Saraidhela, Dist. – Dhanbad. ......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Principle Secretary, Schooling Education & Literacy Department (in short SE & L Department) Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P. O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, Dist. -Ranchi Cum Appellate Authority 3. Director (Secondary Education) Cum Additional Secretary, SE & L Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi -Cum-Disciplinary Authority 4. Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, At, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Hazaribagh–Cum–Enquiry Officer. 5. District Education Officer, Combined Building, P.O., P.S. & Dist. -Dhanbad. 6. Headmaster, Plus 2 High School, PO & P.S Baliapur, Dist.- Dhanbad. .....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Piyush Anand, A.C. to S.C.-VI --------- 12/Dated:-28.08.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this case with the liberty to move Jharkhand Education Tribunal which has been specifically constituted for the purpose of adjudicating the lis between the teachers and the college. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid circumstances, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. 4. Learned Tribunal shall take appropriate decision on the question of limitation in accordance with law. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-