DEODHAR KUMAR ALIAS DEODHAR MAHATO v. THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/18/2025 · 2025-01-15
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27307 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27307 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 18 of 2025
----- 1.Deodhar Kumar @ Deodhar Mahato, S/o Ramprawesh Mahto, present Address- Middle Chutia, Hatia Talab, P.O. + P.S. Chutia, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2.Varun Sharma, S/o Suresh Thakur, R/o Village- Dhadhaur, P.S. Sikandra, District- Jamui (Bihar)
------ Petitioner(s)
Versus 1.The Food Corporation of India through its Managing Director at Barahkhambha Road, Food Corporation of India Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Barahkhambha Road, District New Delhi 2.The Managing Director, Barahkhambha Road, Food Corporation of India Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Barahkhambha Road, District New Delhi 3.The General Manager (Regional), Food Corporation of India, Ranchi 4.The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Ranchi 5.The District Manager (Now Divisional Managr), Food Corporation of India, Ranchi 6.Assistant Manager (Deport), Food Corporation of India, Food Storage Depot, Chutia, Ranchi
------ Respondent(s)
……
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Ranjan, Advocate
Ms. Arpita Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shubham Sinha, Advocate
…...... 04 / 15.01.2025: In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:-
“(i) For issuance of writ or direction commanding upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointments in view of the procedure laid down by the Respondent FCI prevalent at the time of submission of the application of the petitioners and their respective fathers.
(ii)Further to pass order directing the respondent authorities to pass a final
order regarding appointment of the petitioners as their fathers retired prematurely on medical grounds.
(iii)For directing the respondents not to discriminate this case and extend the same benefit of compassionate appointment to these petitioners as it has been already extended to the same and similar situated persons.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have only filed a representation on 12.08.2024 and have approached this Court by filing this writ petition on 30.09.2024, which was registered in January 2025 after the defects were removed.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents submit that their representation will be disposed of after due consideration.
5. Be that as it may, I direct the petitioners to approach the respondent No.3 by filing a fresh representation claiming the relief as claimed in this writ petition. If it is found that the petitioners are entitled for the relief, the same should be extended to the petitioners. If the claim of the petitioners is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to them. The entire process should be concluded within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S.