- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22033 WP No. 15388 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 15388 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. NOORUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS SON OF SRI SHAHABUDDIN AHMAD, R/AT RAMYA TULIP APARTMENT, FLAT NO. F2, 1ST FLOOR AMS EXTENSION, VIDAYARANYAPURA BANGALORE - 560097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOINUDDIN N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MAHENDRA S KANCHAN S/O SHESHU KANCHAN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. 35, C/O NIKITHA NILAYA, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT, BEHIND SABRAM COLLEGE, VIDAYARANYAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560097. 2. CAN FINS HOMES LTD BEGUR BRANCH, NO 2 AND 4, 1ST FLOOR, SHANTI PRIYA LAYOUT, DEVARA CHIKKANAHALLI, BEHIND BEGUR GOVT HIGH SCHOOL, Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22033 WP No. 15388 of 2025 BENGALURU 560068 REP BY THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON/OFFICER. 3. ICICI BANK LTD BOMMANAHALLI BRANCH, HOSUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE KARNATAKA - 560060. REP. BY THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON/OFFICER. 4. ADHARSHA S H S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED IN MAJOR, R/AT NO. 142, MACHOHALLI, MAGAVI MAIN ROAD, MACHOHALLI, BAPNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560091. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D NARAYANASWAMY., ADVOCATE FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1, R3 AND R4 ARE DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER I.E. ANNEXURE A DATED 19.12.2024 PASSED BY THE VII ADDL C J M, BENGALURU IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.3 AND QUASH ALL THE PROCEEDINGS CONNECTED TO THIS NOTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22033 WP No. 15388 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank has filed the Compliance Report and it is submitted that in terms of Annexure-'R2-1', the petitioner has received the moveables duly acknowledged. 2. Perused the order dated 06.06.2025. The submission of petitioner was to the effect that the grievance raised is limited to the recovery of petitioner's moveables in the premises which have been sealed. 3. In light of the Compliance Report filed and Annexure-'R2-1', the petition is disposed off as not calling for adjudication, as the petitioner has received the moveables. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR