HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2464 of 2022 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Jagadish Prasad Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Shatruhan Yadav, leaned AGA for the State are present, however, none present on behalf of opposite parties even in the revised call. 2. The instant revision has been filed by the revisionist with a prayer to quash the judgment and order dated 20.05.2022 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), Azamgarh in Complaint Case No. 05 of 2019, Police Station Raunapar, District Azamgarh. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for revisionist submits, the instant revision has been filed by the revisionist against the order dated 20.05.2022 by which, complaint filed by the revisionist has been dismissed under Section 203 Cr.P.C. but now revisionist does not want to press the instant revision, therefore, instant revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection. 5. In view of above, the instant revision stands dismissed as withdrawn. September 26, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Jagadish Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Lal Behari Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Manbhawati Devi .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad