HARGYAN SINGH GURJAR S/O SHRI BHAJAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12121/2025 · 2025-08-13
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12121/2025 Hargyan Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Bhajan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village Pancholi, Tehsil Sikrai, District- Dausa, Rajasthan - 303509 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director And Joint Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Heritage, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shimbhu Dayal Poswal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 13/08/2025
1. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has already filed the representation (Annexure-5) in the Office of the Commissioner, Nagar Nigam (HQ), Jaipur, but the same has not been decided as yet. He further submits that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is granted an opportunity to file afresh representation for his grievances as narrated in the writ petition before the respondent No.3-Commissioner, Nagar Nigam (HQ), Jaipur, with a direction to decide the same expeditiously and within a time frame.
2. Heard.
[2025:RJ-JP:31558] (2 of 2) [CW-12121/2025]
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No.3, Commissioner, Nagar Nigam (HQ), Jaipur is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from today by a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
5. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
6. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /54