1 11039.25WP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 WRIT PETITION NO. 11039 OF 2025 MANIKRAO EKNATHRAO JAGTAP & OTHERS VERSUS BANDU NAYABRAO JAGTAP & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioners : Mr.G.B.Chate AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar … CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11.09.2025 P.C. : 1] By the present Writ Petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 04.08.2025, passed below Exh.21, by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jalna in Regular Civil Suit No.417/2014, refusing to grant status quo during the pendency of application for interim relief. The Civil Court has refused to grant status quo as the defendant no.3 is required to be heard in the matter since he is the purchaser of the suit property. As such, the ad-interim status quo prayer is rejected. I see no error in the order of the trial Court. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would serve the respondent no.3 by all private permissible modes. 2025:BHC-AUG:24408 2 11039.25WP 3] The trial Court is directed to decide the application below Exh. 5 as early as possible, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of this order. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC