IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 584 of 2025 Nitish Kumar aged about 21 years, son of Raghunandan Saw resident of village Kanaudi, P.O. & P.S.-Hunterganj, District-Chatra, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Adv. Mr. Manish Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. Order No.06/Dated- 14.02.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has been an made accused in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 324/2023 registered under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the I.P.C. and under Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act. 3. As per FIR, a secret information was received by the informant through his senior officials regarding fraud through mobile no.9708809745 on 28.11.2023 at Punjab for Rs.1,63,100/- in the name of Pratbimb App and the mobile is showing the location at Hazaribagh. On such information, police caught two persons and recovered the mobile from the possession of one of the co-accused person. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 10.12.2023. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the case by remaining physically present as and when required and shall not indulge in any manner in tampering with the prosecution evidences or influencing the witnesses of prosecution. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Addl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Earlier the regular bail application of the petitioner has already been rejected on merits and there are no fresh grounds. The status report was also called for from the concerned court which shows that out of 13 charge-sheeted witnesses only 06 witnesses have been examined and remaining 07 witnesses are yet to be examined. Under aforesaid circumstances, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, which stands rejected. 7. The learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial of this case within three months otherwise petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-