IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet.(T) No.147 of 2025 Decided on: 7th January, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chander Singh and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioners seek enforcement of Chander Singh & others Versus State of H.P. & another2. Operative portion of the decision reads as under:- “3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the cases of the petitioners strictly in terms of the judgment dated 17.10.2023, passed in CWP No.7526 of 2021 along with connected matters and the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court dated 9.1.2025 in LPA No.356 of 2024 along with connected matters, within a period of eight weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order. It is further directed that in case the petitioners are found similarly situated to the petitioners in CWP No.7526 of 2021, titled Liaq Ram Sharma & another vs. State of H.P. & others, the 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWPOA No.3491 of 2020, decided on 22.03.2025 2 petitioners will also be granted all the relief and benefits, as have been granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid petition i.e. CWP No.7526 of 2021.” 2. In the aforesaid decision, directions were issued to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners in light of the decision rendered in Laiq Ram Sharma and another Versus State of H.P. and another3 and The State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Versus Laiq Ram Sharma & Ors.4. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that compliance affidavit dated 03.01.2026 has been filed in the Registry of this Court. The same is not on record, however, a copy thereof was made available for perusal. As per the compliance affidavit, respondents have considered the cases of the petitioners alongwith others including Sh. Laiq Ram Sharma, who was the lead petitioner in Laiq Ram Sharma3 and rejected the same under office order dated 03.01.2026. Copy of the said office order has also been appended alongwith the compliance affidavit. 4. In view of the office order issued by the respondents on 03.01.2026, considering and rejecting the cases of the petitioners as also that of Sh. Laiq Ram Sharma, the present execution petition is disposed of 3 CWP No.7526 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 17.10.2023 4 Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s).8418-8420/2025, decided on 27.03.2025 3 reserving liberty to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of their surviving grievances including against the consideration order passed by the respondents. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 07, 2026 Judge Mukesh