Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27264 (GAU)

HARSING RONGPHER v. ANAMIKA TAMULI

Cont.Cas(C)/186/2022 · 2025-12-16

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010054772022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/186/2022 HARSING RONGPHER S/O- LATE MAYARAM RONGPHER, R/O- VILL.- DOLAMARA, P.O. AND P.S. DOLAMARA, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM 1.1: SRI BORSING RONGPHAR SON OF LATE HARSING RONGPHER VILLAGE -DOLAMARA PO DOLAMARA PS DOLAMARA DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 1.2: RABIKA RONGPHARPI DAUGHTER OF LATE HARSING RONGPHER VILLAGE -DOLAMARA PO DOLAMARA PS DOLAMARA DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 1.3: RONSING RONGPHAR SON OF LATE HARSING RONGPHER VILLAGE -DOLAMARA PO DOLAMARA PS DOLAMARA DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSA VERSUS ANAMIKA TAMULI MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM PLANTATION CROPS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., OPPOSITE SARUSAJAI NATIONAL COMPLEX, SAWKUCHI, NATIONAL HIGHWAY-37, LAKHARA, GUWAHATI-781034, Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA, MR P S RAJA Advocate for the Respondent : MRS. R S DEURI, MR. B SARMA,MS T WAPANGLA,MS. M DAS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 17.12 .2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions contained in the order dated 26.03.2021 passed in WP(C) No.2184/2021 has been complied with by the respondent. Considering the submissions made this Court does not wish to proceed in the contempt case. Accordingly, this contempt case stands closed. Notices issued, if any, stand recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant