Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2726 (GAU)

SHRI PRASHANK KUMAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3711/2025 · 2026-02-04

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010042242023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3711/2025 SHRI PRASHANK KUMAR SON OF SHRI KRISHNA GOPAL PAL RESIDENT OF 618 NEW ASHOK NAGAR GOOBA GARDEN KALYANPUR KANPUR NAGAR NEAR SUKHDATA HOSPITAL UTTAR PRADESH 208017 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS SHASTRI BHAWAN NEW DELHI 110001. 2:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN 2079/3 JB TITO MARG SADIQ NAGAR NEW DELHI 3:THE DIRECTOR REFINERY DIVISION INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD REFINERIES DIVISION SCOPE COMPLEX CORE-2 7 INSTITUTIONAL AREA LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 4:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD HUMAN RESOURCES REGINERIES DIVISION GUWAHATI REFINERY NOONMATI GUWAHATI 5:THE CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD SCOPE COMPLEX CORE-2 7 INSTITUTIONAL AREA LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI 6:SHRI PRANAB PATHAK JUNIOR ENGINEERING ASSISTANT - IV P AND U BOILER Page No.# 2/5 GUWAHATI REFINERY P AND U DEPARTMENT 7:SHRI JINTU DEKA JUNIOR ENGINEERING ASSISTNAT - IV P AND U BOILER GUWAHATI REFINERY P AND U DEPARTMENT 8:SHRI MRINAL DEKA JUNIOR ENGINEERING ASSISTANT - IV P AND U BOILER GUWAHATI REFINERY P AND U DEPARTMENT ------------ Advocate for : MR. K N CHOUDHURY Advocate for : SC I O C appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05.02.2026 Heard Mr. R. M. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant/ writ petitioner. Also heard Ms. T. Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party/Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. 2. This is an application seeking impleadment of Shri Jintu Deka and Shri Mrinal Deka as respondent Nos. 7 & 8 in WP(C) No. 8082/2022. 3. The applicant/petitioner has filed the connected writ petition challenging the selection and appointment to the post of Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (P & U) at Guwahati Refinery pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.09.2021, whereby the applications were invited for filling up of post of, inter alia, Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (P & U) in the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Refineries Division). The applicant was not selected despite securing total of 79 Page No.# 3/5 marks under OBC-NCL category. The above persons sought to be impleaded, namely, Shri Jintu Deka and Shri Mrinal Deka, were general candidates who have secured total 72 marks, respectively. However, they have been selected and appointed as Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (P & U). 4. According to the applicant, since he has secured higher marks than the general candidates who have been selected and appointed, he ought to have been selected and appointed in the said post. 5. Mr. R. M. Deka, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that since the selection process itself is under challenge in the connected writ petition, including the selection and appointment of above-named 2 (two) persons pursuant to the said advertisement, they are required to be impleaded being the necessary parties for proper adjudication of the connected writ petition. Therefore, he submits that the applicant may be allowed to implead both Shri Jintu Deka and Shri Mrinal Deka as respondent Nos. 7 & 8 in the connected WP(C) No. 8082/2022. 6. Ms. T. Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party/IOC, while referring to the advertisement, particularly the provisions relating to age limit and relaxation for candidates belonging to SC/ST/OBC(NCL)/PwBD/ExSM, submits that the applicant is an OBC candidate who has availed age relaxation of 3 (three) years, whereas the maximum age prescribed for general category candidates is 26 years. Since the applicant/petitioner has availed the age relaxation of 3 (three) years, he would not be entitled to claim for the post under general category. Therefore, even if the above 2 (two) persons are impleaded, the applicant would not be entitled to claim for the post for which the said 2 (two) persons Page No.# 4/5 have been selected and appointed and as such, the above 2 (two) persons are not the necessary parties to be impleaded in the connected writ petition. 7. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 8. Upon perusal of the advertisement and on its careful consideration, particularly with regard to age limit and relaxation, it cannot be said that once the reserve category candidate availed the age relaxation, he would be barred from competing the post under general category as it is settled that the reserve category candidates would always be allowed to compete with the general category. The applicant having been scored more marks than the general category candidates, prima facie, in view of the settled position of law, the reserve category can be appointed in a post under general category as it is not that the post under the general category is treated to be reserved for general category candidates and in fact is not the reserve post and it is only the reserve post which is exclusively for the reserve category. 9. Having considered that the applicant has challenged the selection process which has been undertaken pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.09.2021 for filling up of various post including the post of Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (P & U), pursuant to which the above 2 (two) persons have been appointed in the said post, and considering that the applicant, although a reserve category candidate, appears to have scored higher marks than the above 2 (two) persons, who are the general candidates, I am of the considered view that the above 2 (two) persons having been selected and appointed in the said post pursuant to the selection process, which is under challenge, they would be the Page No.# 5/5 necessary parties for proper adjudication of the connected writ petition. Thus, I deem it appropriate to allow this interlocutory application. 10. Accordingly, the above 2 (two) persons, namely, Shri Jintu Deka and Shri Mrinal Deka, are allowed to be impleaded as respondent Nos. 7 & 8 in the connected writ petition, being in WP(C) No. 8082/2022. 11. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant