2025:HHC:4142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1025 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Mohinder Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 01.12.2023 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.3126 of 2021, titled Mukesh Thakur and another vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another alongwith connected matters. 2. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 01.12.2023 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Mukesh Thakur’s case (supra), 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:4142 this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondents can be directed to decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court. 3. Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court in Mukesh Thakur’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 01,2025 (shankar)