Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19659 WP No. 15209 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15209 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI K P RAJANNA S/O LATE PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT PARVATHANAPALYA VILLAGE, LAKKENAHALLI POST, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562127. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G B NANDISH GOWDA.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA - 562159.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION RAMANAGARA - 562159.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI - 562120.
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19659 WP No. 15209 of 2025
5.
SRI S NATARAJAN S/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N.
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.43/2, NEAR AYYAPPA TEMPLE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA GARDEN YELAHANKA BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU - 560063.
6.
SRI. MANJUNATHA S S/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO. 173/462, TERINA BEEDHI,WARD NO.8, NEAR VENKATARAMANA SWAMY TEMPLE DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203.
7.
SRI S RAVI PRAKASH S/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R.AT WARD NO.5, NEAR VENKATARAMANA SWAMY TEMPLE DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203.
8.
SRI S CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
9.
SMT. GIRIJA D/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.8 & 9 ARE R/AT NO.3076, WARD NO.25 KUMBARA PETE, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561203.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19659 WP No. 15209 of 2025
10. SMT. S. NAGARATHNA D/O LATE SEETHARAMAIAH N AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT PARVATHAPALYA VILLAGE LAKKANAHALLI POST SOLUR HOBLI MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562127.
11. SRI DEVARAJ D.
S/O LATE DATTATHREYA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R.AT DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 562123. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 - TAHSILDAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI IN CASE NO. RRT NO. (D) 279/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-J;
QUASH MR NO.T16 DATED 09.05.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 - THE TAHSILDAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI VIDE ANNEXURE-K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19659 WP No. 15209 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the fourth respondent in case No.RRT(D)/279/2024-25.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that the petitioner is having efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
4. In the backdrop of the preliminary objection raised by learned Additional Government Advocate and on careful examination of the writ papers, I am of the view that, the order passed by respondent No.4 is an appealable order. It is also forthcoming from the writ papers that with respect to the subject land, an appeal has already been preferred as per Annexure-H, before respondent No.3.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19659 WP No. 15209 of 2025
5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition cannot be accepted and the petitioner has to avail the appeal remedy. As such, if the appeal already preferred as per Annexure-H is still pending consideration before respondent No.3, it is open for the petitioner to agitate his rights before respondent No.3.
6. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17