IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 753 CWP-12011-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 Maya Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Ms. Anamika Shoeran, Advocate for Mr. Mukund Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Shruti, AAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 19/18.06.2004, Annexure P-17, vide which new condition had been imposed with regard to the regularisation. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 2 of the preliminary objection of the written statement dated 16.03.2005 filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 to state that the petitioner did not fulfill the requisite qualifications and as such her claim was rejected vide order dated 21.07.2004, Annexure R-1 by the Committee constituted for the said purpose, which had not been challenged by the petitioner, even though this petition was filed on 30.07.2004. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite best efforts she has not been able to establish contact with the client. 4. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case lis still survives. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 22.04.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.04.23 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document