1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 664 of 2018 1 - Amrit S/o Late Ramdas Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Rajkheta Tahsil Wadrafnagar , District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Addl. Commissioner, Surguja Division - Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Tahsildar, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh., 4 - Mithlesh Kumar Dubey S/o Late Rameshwar Dubey Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil - Wadrafnagar District Balrampur - Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) & WP227 No. 650 of 2018 1 - Ramkeshwar S/o Devraj Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ishwar S/o Devraj Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 2 3 - Ramgarib S/o Narhu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Ramlal S/o Ramgarib Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Addl. Commissioner, Surguja, Division- Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tahsildar Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mithlesh Kumar Dubey S/o S/o Late Rameshwar Dubey Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Rajkheta, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ......Revisioner --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Akanchha Vishwakarma, Adv. on behalf of Shri A.N.Pandey, Advocate For Respondent / State : Shri Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Shri Saurabh Sharma, Advocate ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 17.09.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions in the matter. 2. Accordingly, the above petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2025.09.17 17:01:25 +0530