Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27241 (AP)

VEEDHI KANAKAMMA & ORS. v. NEDUNURI BATNAM & ORS.

SA/733/2000 · 2025-02-19

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010385392000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 733/2000 Between: Veedhi Kanakamma & Ors. ...APPELLANT AND Nedunuri Ratnam Ors ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/plaintiffs under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 20.04.2000 passed in A.S.No.58 of 1999 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 29.09.1999 passed in O.S.No.46 of 1991 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge, Mummidivaram. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:19.02.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.733 OF 2000 Date:19.02.2025 MS