APHC010385832006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI WRIT PETITION No: 6558 of 2006 Between: 1. THE GOVT. OF A.P., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. J.D. ANAND KUMAR, TOWN PLANNING SUPERVISOR, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent: 1. Mr.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No: 6558 of 2006 THE GOVT. OF A.P., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND J.D. ANAND KUMAR, TOWN PLANNING SUPERVISOR, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent: Mr.KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3549] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA THE GOVT. OF A.P., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ANDHRA THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER(S) J.D. ANAND KUMAR, TOWN PLANNING SUPERVISOR, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT 2 The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble NJS, J) The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 06.01.2006 in O.A.No.225 of 2006. The Tribunal while suspending the proceedings in G.O.Rt.No.580, dated 27.04.2005 placing the respondent / applicant under suspension, directed his continuation in the post of Town Planning Supervisor. In the present Writ Petition, a Division Bench of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad vide Order dated 03.04.2006 in W.P.M.P.No.8380 of 2006, granted interim suspension. The learned Government Pleader submits that the main O.A., according to his oral instructions is still pending. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to go into merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The interim orders granted by this Court shall remain till the disposal of the main O.A. No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA BLV Dt. 08.09.2025 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No: 6558 of 2006 (Per Ninala Jayasurya, J) Date: 08.09.2025 BLV