APHC010386082018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 18117/2018 Between: IVATURI JAYARAM, S/O LATE VEERESHWAR RAO, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.9-332/22, 4TH LANE, RAJENDRANAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CB CID (CRIMES), HEADQUARTERS OFFICE AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. MR RAVI PRAKASH, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5. MR NAGESHWAR NAIK, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMADOLE POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. C ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S TULASI DAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the issuance of notice u/s 41-A of Cr.P.C. dt.12-05- 2018 by the respondent No.5 with reference to 2 Crime No.184 of 2017 when the writ petitions No.33162, 34573 of 2017 are pending for disposal before this Honble Court and the seriousness involved in the case is illegal, unfair, void and opposed to the Constitutional guarantees embodied in Articles 14, 15, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, the above crime was referred as Un- Detected vide proposal of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer in C.No.396/Refer/SDO-E/2018, dated 04.06.2018. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. None represented for the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:24.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18117 of 2018 Dt.24.07.2025 Dinesh