M/s Puneeth Developers, v. Anil Kumar Singhal, IAS,
CC/3574/2024 · 2025-07-16
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27231 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27231 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010385282024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3574/2024 Between:
1. M/S PUNEETH DEVELOPERS, NO. 10-152, KAZA, MANGALAGIRI (M), GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, SIMHADRI NAGARJUNA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 5-41/1, KAZA, MANGALAGIRI (M), GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. M JANAKI IAS, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. M HARI NARAYANAN IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH PINCODE- 522502
4. SHAIK ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER OF MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI MAIN ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH, 522503. ...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful disobedience of order of this Hon’ble Court passed in WP.No.6726 of 2024, dt. 29-04-2024 passed by Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed 5 to 7 respondents as 5 to 7 respondents in the main C.C. No. 3574 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
3. J DILEEP KUMAR
3
The Court made the following order:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 29.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.6726 of 2024. 2.
Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 29.04.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.6726 of 2024, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17.07.2025 MP
4
139 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:3574 of 2024 Date: 17.07.2025
MP