Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010230142025 2025:GAU-AS:16197 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6034/2025 TAKMINA KHATUN AND 2 ORS D/O LT TAHER ALI, W/O NUR JAMAL SHEIKH, VILL- SREEGRAM PART-V (HARIDAL) P.O. SALKOCHA, P.S. CHAPAR, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348 2: SABIBAR ALI SON OF LATE TAHER ALI VILL- SREEGRAM PART-V (HARIDAL) P.O. SALKOCHA P.S. CHAPAR DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783348 3: HABIBAR ALI SON OF LATE TAHER ALI VILL- SREEGRAM PART-V (HARIDAL) P.O. SALKOCHA P.S. CHAPAR DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78334 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY Page No.# 2/3 GHY-01 4:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY DHUBRI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301 5:THE CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78330 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN, MR A.K. MOLLAH,MR. R I MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,SC, ASLSA BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR 26.11.2025 Heard Mr M Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms M Barman, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5; Mr A Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department; appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 2; and Ms R H Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, ASLSA, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 3. 2. The claim here is that the petitioners had been awarded an amount Rs. 5 lacs as compensation, but the said amount has not been disbursed to the petitioners on the ground of lack of fund. 3. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioners has produced the order dated 24.11.2025, passed in WP(C) No. 6135/2025, where this Court had directed the respondent authorities to release and disburse the amount of the final compensation to the petitioner, within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of the order. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsels for the parties are in consonance that a similar order would suffice the requirements of this writ petition also. 5. Accordingly, it is directed that the respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5, shall take appropriate steps within a period of 2 (two) weeks from today to submit the requisite proposal for compliance of the compensation awarded to the appropriate authority in the Finance Department. On receipt of such proposal, the Finance Department would carry out the necessary formalities and ensure release of funds for disbursal to the petitioner, within a period of 6 (six) weeks thereafter. 6. The entire exercise is required to be completed within a period of 12 (weeks) from the date of this order. 7. Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant