Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010385312018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 17934/2018 Between: M. Mutyalu Naidu ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MAMIDI AVINASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K DHANUNJAYA REDDY (SC FOR NANNAYA UNIVERSITY)
2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to issue Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing the impugned G.O.Rt.No.70 dated 19.04.2018 as being illegal, arbitrary, vitiated for vagueness, violative of provisions of A.P.Universities Act, 1991 and offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently, set aside the same and further consequently, direct the Respondents not to interfere with the duties of the Petitioner in his capacity as Vice Chancellor of the 2nd Respondent University.”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
2
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University are in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 17934 of 2018
26.03.2025
Mjl /*