Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27220 (GAU)

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SRI RABINDRA BORA AND 2 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3960/2025 · 2025-12-07

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010258542025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3960/2025 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI -781007 VERSUS SRI RABINDRA BORA AND 2 ORS. S/O LATE KUSHRAM BORA, R/O MORAKALONG, P. O. - AHATGURI, P.S. - DHARAMTUL, DISTRICT - MORIGAON, ASSAM. PTN -782412 2:SRI LILA BALLAV CHETRI S/O LATE R. B. CHETRI R/O - DURUNG P. O. P.S. - KHETRI DISTRICT - KAMRUP ASSAM. PRN - 782403 3:SRI SUKUMAL BARMAN S/O LATE PARESH BARMAN R/O - CHOKITOP P.O. - CHOTO HAIBOR P.S. - SADAR DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN - 78200 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P SHARMA, MS. C MOZUMDAR,MS. R D MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD . HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI -781007 VERSUS SRI RABINDRA BORA S/O LATE KUSHRAM BORA R/O MORAKALONG P. O. - AHATGURI P.S. - DHARAMTUL DISTRICT - MORIGAON ASSAM. PTN -782412 2:SRI LILA BALLAV CHETRI (OWNER S/O LATE R. B CHETRI R/O - DURUNG P. O. P.S. - KHETRI DISTRICT - KAMRUP ASSAM. PRN - 782403 3:SRI SUKUMAL BARMAN (DRIVER S/O LATE PARESH BARMAN R/O - CHOKITOP P.O. - CHOTO HAIBOR P.S. - SADAR DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN - 782003 ------------ Advocate for : Samujjal Pratim Sharma Advocate for : appearing for SRI RABINDRA BORA Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 08.12.2025 Heard Mr. S.P. Sharma, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 19 days of delay in preferring the connected MAC Appeal. 3. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. Going for issuing notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. 5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant