APHC010385702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19924/2025 Between: 1. VAYALAPALLI NAGENDAR, S/O V. TIRUMALA RAO, HINDU AGED 31 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 1-105, MAKARAJOLA VILLAGE, MANDASA MANDALAM, RANGOI POST, SRIKAKULAM, A.P.-532243. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LAW AND ORDER, BEEMILI POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SRI DASARI SATEESH, . S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, HINDU, AGED 28 YEARS. RAILWAY STATION ROAD, ALLIPURAM KARNALA STREET ROAD, RAMACHANDRA CIRCLE, NERELLA KONERU HOUSE, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.-530004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3RDRespondent in calling and harassing the Petitioner on a purely civil 2 dispute as illegal, unconstitutional and infringement of fundamental rights under Article rd 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct 3 Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct 3RD Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes between the Petitioner and 4TH Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M.M.M. KRISHNA SANAPALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: … to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3RDRespondent in calling and harassing the Petitioner on a purely civil dispute as illegal, unconstitutional and infringement of fundamental rights under Article rd 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct 3 Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri M.M.Krishna Sarpala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that basing on the complaint of the respondent No.4, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry but no case has been registered against the petitioner and to that effect the written instructions dated 27.07.2025 are placed on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.08.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 105 WRIT PETITION NO: 19924/2025 Dt.01.08.2025 MH