Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010264062025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3854/2025 In WP(C)/7631/2018 RAKESH KUMAR SURANA S/O SURAJMAL SURANA R/O 12, M.S. ROAD, FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI -01. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI -6. 2:THE JOINT SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO PANBAZAR GUWAHATI -1 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE DISPUR GUWAHATI - Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R CHAKRAVORTY, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard Shri R. Chakravorty, learned counsel for the applicant, who by means of this application has prayed for correction of a typographical error which crept in the order dated 22.10.2025 passed in the connected WP(C)/7631/2018. By drawing the attention of this Court to paragraph 11 of the said judgment, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the number of the Ceiling Case should have been Ceiling Case 225 instead of Ceiling Case 2025. Ms. M. Barman, learned State Counsel has not objected to the aforesaid prayer for correction. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that in the aforesaid judgment, there is an inadvertent error in so far as giving the number of the Ceiling Case. It is accordingly directed that Ceiling Case 2025 appearing in paragraph 11 should be read as Ceiling Case 225. IA accordingly stands allowed. Let this order be read as a part of the order dated 22.10.2025 passed in WP(C)/7631/2018. IA stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant