Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7246 of 2024 Applicant :- Anar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Singh Yadav,Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. Notice on the first informant has already been served as per office report dated 09.05.2024. Despite service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the first informant even in the revised list. 4. This is third bail application. The first bail application being Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 10831 of 2021 (Anar Singh Vs. State of U.P.) was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2021 and the second bail application being Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 43749 of 2021 (Anar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another) was rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.02.2022. 5. This third bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure/483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Anar Singh, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 147 of 2020 (Session Case No. 301 of 2020, State Vs. Anar Singh), under Sections 354-B, 376 IPC and Section 7/8, 3/4 POCSO Act, registered at P.S. Sahawar, District Kasganj. 6. The records show that on the last occasion i.e. 13.05.2024 illness slip was reported of learned counsel for the applicant and the other learned counsel was not present and the following order was passed: "1. List revised. This is second bail application. 2. There is an illness reported of Sri Sanjay Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant. There is one other learned counsel appearing in the matter who is not present. 3. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. Notice was issued to the first informant vide order dated 05.04.2024. As per the office report dated 09.05.2024, a report dated 26.04.2024 of C.J.M. concerned has been received stating therein that notice has been served on the first informant. 5. Despite service of notice no one appears on behalf of the first informant even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. 6. Since there is an illness slip on behalf of learned counsel for the applicant, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned. 7. Put up this matter on 23.07.2024." 7. Today despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant or from the side of the first informant to press this bail application. The incident is of the year 2020. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant has lost interest in the matter. 8. In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 M. ARIF Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad