HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1078/2025 1. Mahendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Kailash Chand Yadav, aged about 29 years, R/o Chhajana, Tehsil Khandela, Chak Chhajna, Sikar. 2. Chandrashekhar Kumawat S/o Shri Kaluram Kumawat, aged about 32 years, R/o Niwana, Jaipur. 3. Gulab Singh S/o Shri Motilal, aged about 28 years, R/o Ballu Singh Ki Dhani, Bhaniyana, jaisalmer. 4. Himmat Singh S/o Shri Madan Singh Charan, aged about 31 years, R/o Charano ka Baas, Surpaliya, Nagaur. 5. Guddu Kanwar D/o Shri Jai Singh Tanwar, aged about 31 years, R/o Dhani Swaroop Singh, Hanspur, Hansapur, Sikar. 6. Priyanka D/o Shri Dayaram, aged about 25 years, r/o Banthod, Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance (Rules), Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Additional Director General of Police (Armed Battalion), Police Headquarters Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Commandant, 2nd Battalion, RAC, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karishma Soni for Mr. Vinod Kumar Goyal-AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/02/2025 1. Grievance of the petitioners herein is for providing them notional benefits as provided to their counterparts. 2. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court at (2 of 2) [CW-1078/2025] Jaipur in case of Dara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.:S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012. 3. In the premise, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are sanguine that if their case is taken up on administrative side, they will be meted out with favourable treatment. 4. In view of the submissions made, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation of the petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in the case of Dara Singh (supra), as expeditiously as possible. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/51