Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27207 (RAJ)

SONU S/O TOLARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10507/2025 · 2025-08-22

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33403] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10507/2025 1. Sonu S/o Tolaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Patoli, P/s Aligarh, District Tonk (Presently Prisoner In Central Jail, Tonk) 2. Shivam Kumar S/o Mastram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Patoli, P/s Aligarh, District Tonk (Presently Prisoner In Central Jail, Tonk) 3. Aakash S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Patoli, P/s Aligarh, District Tonk (Presently Prisoner In Central Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 22/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Sonu S/o Tolaram, Shivan Kumar S/o Mastram, Aakash S/o Rameshwar in FIR No. 88/2025 dated 19.05.2025 registered at P.S. Aligarh District - Tonk, whereby the applicants-accused was charged under Sections 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance and Section 112(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 340(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. [2025:RJ-JP:33403] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10507/2025] 2. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for petitioners further submits that co-accused Vikram has been enlarged on bail by this Hon’ble Court on 05.08.2025 and the case of present petitioners is identical with him. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of search and seizure on 18.05.2025 a criminal case has been registered against these petitioners along with Vikram and Vikram has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 05.08.2025. The allegations are almost identical in nature. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, [2025:RJ-JP:33403] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10507/2025] the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Sonu S/o Tolaram, Shivam Kumar S/o Mastram, Aakash S/o Rameshwar , is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /20(COURT NO.16)