Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106-a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2394-1993 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 22, 2025 Ram Nath … Appellant Versus Ajit Singh (now deceased) through LRs and others …Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
DEEPAK GUPTA
, J.(Oral)
There is no representa#on on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the posi#on on 25.11.2024 and 04.12.2024 when the ma*er had been earlier listed.
2. It is also no#ced that on 25.11.2024, it was informed by
learned counsel for respondent No.1 that par#es had agreed to se*le the dispute amicably. However, no one has put in appearance for the appellant. It is also no#ced that as per the last order, the appellant is reported have expired. No applica#on has been moved to bring on record his LRs #ll date.
3. Having regard to all the aforesaid facts and circumstances, present appeal is hereby disposed of with liberty to the LRs of the appellant to get it revived, in case any cause of ac#on s#ll survives. January 22, 2025
(DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2025.01.22 15:32 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order