Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27205 (BOM)

SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST SHIRDI THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CA/9456/2025 · 2025-09-16

Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1140(B)-CA-9456-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9456 OF 2025 IN PIL/98/2021 SHREE SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST SHIRDI THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .… Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. K. Tambe, Addl. G.P. for the State Mr. Ajinkya Kale, Advocate i/b Talekar & Associates for the Petitioner in PIL Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for Respondent No.10, Mr. A. V. Hon, Advocate for Respondent No.14, Mr. Rahul Tambe, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4,6 to 9 and 13, Mr. A. C. Darandale, Advocate for Respondent No.12, Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.11, Mr. Shaikh A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for Respondent No.5, Mr. S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in PIL .… CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 16.09.2025 PER COURT :- 1. The applicant Shree Sai Baba Sansthan, Shirdi, has moved this application seeking the following relief:- “(B) The applicant may please be permitted to implement the Resolution No.387 dtd. 13.08.2025 for payment of the Ex-gratia Amount to the employees of Sansthan for which an estimated amount of Rs.14,10,00,000/- is required to be spent.” 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:24979-DB (( 2 )) 1140(B)-CA-9456-2025 2. The applicant places reliance on Resolution No.387 passed by the Ad-hoc Committee of the Sansthan. We have perused the said resolution, which duly approved the payment of exgratia amount to the employees of the applicant Sansthan. The learned counsel for the applicant invited attention of this Court to the proposal, leading to the aforesaid resolution No.387 dated 13.08.2025 passed by the Ad-hoc Committee. 3. In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), quoted herein above. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANISH PITALE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2