IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VIKASH STATE OF Haryana CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. This petition Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No. under Sections 140(3), 310(2), 61(b) of BNS District Mahendergarh. 2. As per t Kumar was going towards his house on his scooty occupants of a vehicle and by an unknown road. They snatched cash amount of from him. They also get transferred an amount of respectively from his bank accounts they damaged the forest area, they fled away. After registration of FIR against unknown persons, investigation proceedings IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9307 of 2025 Reserved on Pronounced on Versus STATE OF Haryana HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) This petition has been filed under Section 48 Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No.309 ns 140(3), 310(2), 61(b) of BNS, at Police Station District Mahendergarh. As per the allegations, on 08.11.2024, was going towards his house on his scooty a white colour car, who were 3 in number. They stopped his vehicle and by pushing him inside their car, covered his face and took him to an unknown road. They snatched cash amount of . They also get transferred an amount of from his bank accounts by using his mobile they damaged the SIM card of his mobile phone forest area, they fled away. After registration of FIR against unknown persons, proceedings were initiated. During the course of investigati IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.9307 of 2025 Reserved on : 26.03.2025 Pronounced on: 04.04.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA . Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana.. filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to 309 dated 09.11.2024 registered , at Police Station Sadar Narnaul, he allegations, on 08.11.2024, the complainant-Rakesh was going towards his house on his scooty when he was intercepted by who were 3 in number. They stopped his car, covered his face and took him to an unknown road. They snatched cash amount of `15000/- and mobile phone . They also get transferred an amount of` `1 lakh and `62,000/- by using his mobile phone. Thereafter, card of his mobile phone and after leaving him in the forest area, they fled away. After registration of FIR against unknown persons, . During the course of investigation, Bharatiya bail to registered Sadar Narnaul, Rakesh when he was intercepted by who were 3 in number. They stopped his car, covered his face and took him to and mobile phone - . Thereafter, fter leaving him in the forest area, they fled away. After registration of FIR against unknown persons, n, Jyoti 2025.04.05 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM CCTV footage from the house of Sarpanch of which revealed that the vehicle used one Anil who disclosed that he sold the same to one Ankit Ankit disclosed that he had sold was arrested on 09.11.2024. He suffered disclosure statement admitting his complicity in the Kumar, Rajesh arrested on 10.11.2024. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the disclosure statement of co suffered disclosure statement admitting his involvement fact that an amount of Rs.10,000/ that the SIM card used in the revealed that the petitioner had driven the car in which the victim was kidnapped and had brought him to concluded. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner tha falsely implicated in this case accused which cannot be consider has been effected from him. No injury had been his cell phone incident. He is in custody since conclude. His further incarceration would not serve any useful purpose. Accordingly, it is urged that he deserves to be released on bail. CRM-M No.9307 of 2025 CCTV footage from the house of Sarpanch of which revealed that the vehicle used in the crime was registered in the name of Anil who disclosed that he sold the same to one Ankit disclosed that he had sold the same to accused Ashish was arrested on 09.11.2024. He suffered disclosure statement admitting his in the crime and also disclosed about the involvement of the Kumar, Rajesh @ Raju, Dinesh @ Monu. These nominated accused were arrested on 10.11.2024. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the disclosure statement of co-accused Rajesh@ Raju. He was arrested on 25.11 suffered disclosure statement admitting his involvement fact that an amount of Rs.10,000/- had fallen to his share. He also disclosed the SIM card used in the crime had been destroyed by him. It was also revealed that the petitioner had driven the car in which the victim was kidnapped and had brought him to Nimbi It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner tha falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statements of the co which cannot be considered to be admissible in evidence. has been effected from him. No injury had been number shows that he was present elsewhere He is in custody since long. The trial will take His further incarceration would not serve any useful purpose. it is urged that he deserves to be released on bail. -2- CCTV footage from the house of Sarpanch of Nimbi village was obtained in the crime was registered in the name of Anil who disclosed that he sold the same to one Ankit and on contact, the same to accused Ashish. Accused Ashish was arrested on 09.11.2024. He suffered disclosure statement admitting his and also disclosed about the involvement of the Arun . These nominated accused were arrested on 10.11.2024. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the disclosure Raju. He was arrested on 25.11.2024 and suffered disclosure statement admitting his involvement in the crime and the had fallen to his share. He also disclosed crime had been destroyed by him. It was also revealed that the petitioner had driven the car in which the victim was hill. Investigation now stands It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been on the basis of disclosure statements of the co- admissible in evidence. No recovery has been effected from him. No injury had been attributed to him. Location of he was present elsewhere at the time of he trial will take considerable time to His further incarceration would not serve any useful purpose. it is urged that he deserves to be released on bail. was obtained in the crime was registered in the name of , . Accused Ashish was arrested on 09.11.2024. He suffered disclosure statement admitting his Arun . These nominated accused were arrested on 10.11.2024. The name of the petitioner surfaced in the disclosure .2024 and e had fallen to his share. He also disclosed crime had been destroyed by him. It was also revealed that the petitioner had driven the car in which the victim was . Investigation now stands t he has been - No recovery of at the time of time to His further incarceration would not serve any useful purpose. Jyoti 2025.04.05 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM 4. Status report has been filed. It is argued by learned State counsel that keeping in view the gravity of the allegations as levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve to be extended benefi 5. The petitioner is alleged to have hatched accused for abducting the complainant and pursuance thereof, victim and snatched money from him. He is in custody sin Challan stands presented. The trial would take considerable time witnesses of the prosecution has been examined so far. consideration the above discussed fact comment on the merit prosecution/petitio be released on bail the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/ CJM concerned 6. Since, the main petition is disposed of, pending application, if any also stands disposed of accordingly. 04.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.9307 of 2025 Status report has been filed. It is argued by learned State counsel keeping in view the gravity of the allegations as levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve to be extended benefi The petitioner is alleged to have hatched for abducting the complainant and extracting money from him and i pursuance thereof, he along with co-accused is alleged to have abducted the victim and snatched money from him. He is in custody sin Challan stands presented. The trial would take considerable time witnesses of the prosecution has been examined so far. deration the above discussed facts but without m comment on the merits of the case, lest they /petitioner, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to ction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/ CJM concerned Since, the main petition is disposed of, pending application, if any also stands disposed of accordingly. (MANISHA Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No -3- Status report has been filed. It is argued by learned State counsel keeping in view the gravity of the allegations as levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve to be extended benefit of bail. The petitioner is alleged to have hatched a conspiracy with the co- extracting money from him and in is alleged to have abducted the victim and snatched money from him. He is in custody since 25.11.2024. Challan stands presented. The trial would take considerable time as none of the witnesses of the prosecution has been examined so far. Taking into s but without meaning to make any they prejudice the case of the the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to ction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/ CJM concerned. Since, the main petition is disposed of, pending application, if any (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Status report has been filed. It is argued by learned State counsel keeping in view the gravity of the allegations as levelled against the - n is alleged to have abducted the ce 25.11.2024. as none of the Taking into any prejudice the case of the the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to Since, the main petition is disposed of, pending application, if any Jyoti 2025.04.05 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document