[2025:RJ-JP:3645-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11946/2021 1. Atar Singh S/o Shri Mularam, Aged About 56 Years, R/o- Near Central School, Ramnagar Colony, Bharatpur (Rajasthan), Pin Code - 321001. 2. Kishan Lal S/o Shri Babu Pahalwan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o-Chhoukar Wali Vakhar, B Narayan Gate, Mali Mohalla, Bharatpur(Rajasthan), Pin Code 321001. 3. Madan Mohan S/o Shri Dal Chand, Aged About 54 Years, R/o- A-145 Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur(Rajasthan), Pin Code -321001. 4. Digambar Sharma S/o Shri Lakhan Lal Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o-Nale Ke Pass, Tilak Nagar Colony, Bharatpur(Rajasthan), Pin Code - 321001. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Finances (Budget), Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Joint Secretary-I, Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Deputy Secretary-Ii, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. The Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Circle Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG assisted by Ms. Manaswita Nakwaal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 24/01/2025 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners. On 09.11.2021, the following order was passed:- “List on 13.12.2021, as prayed.” [2025:RJ-JP:3645-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-11946/2021] Again on 13.12.2021, no one was present to argue the matter on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to argue the matter even in the second round. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayer(s):- “(i) A direction of nature of writ thereof may kindly be issued and the Notification bearing No.NO.F.14(1) FD (RULES) 2013 dated 30.10.2017 along with Annexure “A”, Schedule-I appended with the impugned notification (ANNEXURE-P/7) qua to the humble petitioner may kindly be declared ex-facie illegal, capricious, bad in the eyes of law, ultra vires and the same may kindly be quashed. (ii) A direction thereof may kindly be issued that the refixation of pay be done in accordance with the Order dated 28.06.2013 and all the benefits, increments, upgradations already accrued to the petitioner be duly restored. (iii) Any other relief or order which this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted in favour of the humble petitioner. (iv) The Cost of the Writ Petition may kindly be awarded to the Petitioner.” We have perused the prayers made by the petitioners in this writ petition as well as the Notification dated 30.10.2017. In our considered view, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to pursue this writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J SAHIL SONI /32