[2025:RJ-JP:34907] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10155/2025 Rohit Sharma @ Chinki S/o Shri Suresh Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Swaroop Sarai, Ps Tehsil Mundawar, District Khairthal Tijara, Presently Deed Writer Tehsil Neemrana, Dist. Kotputli-Behror, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal with Ms. Vandana Aoudichya For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Assitt. G.A. Mr. Manish K. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.662/2022 registered at Police Station Behror, District Bhiwadi (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that co- accused namely Gyarsilal, Narendra Singh, Sumarjeet, Satyaveer Singh, Mukesh Rajput & Yashveer @ Chhuttan have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:34907] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10155/2025] Petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the complainant submits that petitioner is main accused of this case. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner of receiving any amount in his account and person against whom there is allegation of receiving money, has already been granted benefit of bail. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; aforesaid co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Rohit Sharma @ Chinki S/o Shri Suresh Kumar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of [2025:RJ-JP:34907] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10155/2025] the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 12. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /136