APHC010384652018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 17741/2018 Between: 1. NARRA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT31 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. 5-50-28, 6/154 BRODIPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. NARRA TRINEESHA, W/O PAVAN KUMAR, AGES 23 YEARS, R/O LINGAPURAM VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of 4th respondent and threatening him to transfer the property on the name of the 4th respondent and thereby causing interference in the matrimonial dispute during the pendency of the HMOP No.69112017 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur, without any authority, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in 2017 SCC-821 in the case of Rajesh Sharma Vs. Stale of U.P., and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in declaring the in action of the respondents in not conducting the enquiry or investigation in the case registering FIR No.9 of 2018 dated 09.01.2018 under Sec. 408, 420 IPC on the complainant referred Under Sec. 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. in C.F.NO.1926 of 2016 on the file of Hon'ble V Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Nellore made by the petitioner is being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to complete the investigation and file charge sheet by taking action against accused in the said crime and to pass ....” 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same may be disposed of. 3. Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 17741 of 2018 15.07.2025 Mjl /*