2025:HHC:4279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.857 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.03.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Dr. Harish Lakhanpal ……...Petitioner Versus Sh. Rakesh Kanwar and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 01.03.2025, issued under the signatures of Additional Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated has been implemented, subject to outcome of the LPA, which is pending adjudication, and in that regard, necessary directions has already been issued to the Department. 2. Consequently, in view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of, with the direction to respondents to ensure that needful 2025:HHC:4279 2 in terms of judgment, alleged to have been violated, is complied with, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate proceedings are initiated against the erring officials. March 03, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge