CWP-4523-2025 (O&M) 148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Guga Mari Mandir and others U.T. Chandigarh CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the respondent SUDHIR SINGH At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present writ petition has become infructuous as petition, the temporary structure has already been removed by the respondent. 2. Disposed of as having been r 3. Pending April 22, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Guga Mari Mandir and others versus Chandigarh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Kumar Vishav Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the respondent ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present writ petition has become infructuous as the temporary structure has already been removed by the respondent. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 1 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4523-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 22, 2025 .….Petitioners …. Respondent SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the respondent – U.T., Chandigarh. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous as during pendency of the writ the temporary structure has already been removed by the respondent. endered infructuous. shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 1 Petitioners espondent U.T., Chandigarh. the during pendency of the writ MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.29 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment