( 2025:JHHC:24326 ) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 947 of 2023 Mohit Jhunjhunwala, aged about 32 years, S/o Sri Girdhar Jhunjhunwala @ Sri Girdhari Kumar Jhunjhunwala, R/o B-601, Royal Gardens, Nageshwar Colony, P.O. Patna G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali Thana, District- Patna (Bihar) … Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Pooja Chirania, aged about 31 years, W/o Mohit Jhunjhunwala, D/o Sri Bajrang Lal Chirania at present residing at 65, S.P.G., Mission Compound, Mahulsai, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar, Chaibasa, District- Singhbhum West … Opposite Parties With Cr. Revision No. 1254 of 2023 Pooja Chirania, aged about 30 years, W/o Mohit Jhunjhunwala, D/o Sri Bajrang Lal Chirania, R/o 65, Ward No.6, Mahul Sai Road, Sidheswar Temple, SPG, Mission Compound, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District- East Singhbhum, presently residing at 65, S.P.C. Mission Compound, Mahulsai, C/o Bajrang Lal Chirania, Chaibasa, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar, Chaibasa, Dist.-West Singhbhum, Jharkhand … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mohit Jhunjhunwala, aged about 32 years, S/o Sri Girdhari Jhunjhunwala, R/o B-601, Royal Gardens, Nageshwar Colony, P.O. Patna G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali Thana, District- Patna (Bihar) … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Md. Belal Ashraf Khan, Advocate (In Cr. Rev.-947/2023) Ms. Megha Priya, Advocate (In Cr. Rev.1254/2023) For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. (In Cr. Rev.-947/2023) Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. (In Cr. Rev.-1254/2023) For O.P. No.2 : Ms. Megha Priya, Advocate (In Cr. Rev.-947/2023) Md. Belal Ashraf Khan, Advocate (In Cr. Rev.-1254/2023) ----- 09/20.08.2025 These matters relate to Original Maintenance Case No.68/2022. 2. Md. Belal Ashraf Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Cr. Revision No.947 of 2023 on instruction of Mr. Lukesh Kumar, who is Advocate-on-Record and Ms. Megha Priya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Cr. Revision No.1254 of 2023 on instruction of Mrs. Shruti Shrestha, who is Advocate-on-Record, seek permission to withdraw the criminal revision petitions respectively. ( 2025:JHHC:24326 ) -2- 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State and opposite party no.2 in both the criminal revision petitions have got no objection. 4. Accordingly, both these criminal revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending I.A., if any, is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/