SMT. INDIRAMMA v. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE)
WP/15060/2022 · 2025-06-24
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27175 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27175 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21923 WP No. 15060 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 15060 OF 2022 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
SMT. INDIRAMMA W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, EARLIER RESIDING AT NO.40, 1ST CROSS, RAJEEV GANDHINAGAR, LAGGERE, BANGALORE-560 058.
AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.59, C.M.LAYOUT, 1ST CROSS, ITI LAYOUT, 9TH MAIN ROAD, HSR EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMAR.S.J., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), S-19, SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM, VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 076.
2.
SRI. RAMESH S/O SRI. CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.19, NEAR GANESHAGUDI BEEDI, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 096. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANUJ UDUPA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN.H., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21923 WP No. 15060 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 10.06.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed on 24.06.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal'. The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal'. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21923 WP No. 15060 of 2022
Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31