1 APHC010385042025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19822/2025 Between: 1. EARLADINNE SREEDHAR, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC DOCTOR, R/O. H.NO.9/19/66-1, KOTTAPETA, GANDHI NAGAR, DHONE TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522020. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , O/O. DIG, KURNOOL RANGE, B-CAMP, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DHONE TOWN POLICE STATION, DHONE, NANDYAL (KURNOOL) DISTRICT. 6. KOTRIKE SURESH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.15-114, MAIN BAZAR, PATHAPETA, DHONE TOWN, NANDYAL (KURNOOL) DISTRICT. 2 7. KOTRIKE VENKATESWARLU, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.15-114, MAIN BAZAR, PATHAPETA, DHONE TOWN, NANDYAL (KURNOOL) DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not initiating action on petitioners representations dated 28-01- 2025, 10-02- 2025 and 11-07-2025 which was made against the respondents 6 and 7 who are threatening and trying to implicate in a false cases, the 5th respondent calling the petitioner and detaining him hours together in his police station to settle the civil disputes in his police station, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent not to call the petitioner into Police Station and detain hours together, interfering in Civil litigation, further direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take necessary action on petitioners above representations and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to call the petitioner into Police Station and detain hours together, interfering in Civil litigation, further direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take necessary action on petitioner’s representations 28-01-2025, 10-02-2025 and 11-07-2025 forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19822/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not initiating action on petitioners representations dated 28-01-2025, 10-02-2025 and 11-07-2025 which was made against the respondents 6 and 7 who are threatening and trying to implicate in a false cases, the 5th respondent calling the petitioner and detaining him hours together in his police station to settle the civil disputes in his police station, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent not to call the petitioner into Police Station and detain hours together, interfering in Civil litigation, further direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take necessary action on petitioners above representations and pass…” 2. Sri Challa Sivasankar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station and trying to implicate him in false cases and detaining him until late hours. 3. Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that after receiving the representations from the petitioner, the police have conducted a preliminary enquiry and found that the core dispute in the present case arises out of private monetary transactions. Since this matter entirely pertains to personal financial transactions and falls under the category of a civil dispute, the police are not interfering in the same. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow the procedure according to law. As 4 no case has been registered against the petitioner, they are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.08.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19822 of 2025 Dated.01.08.2025 UPS 136