Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27170 (GAU)

CHOLAMANDALM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. DAIJE GOGOI AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3432/2025 · 2025-12-07

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010195832025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3432/2025 CHOLAMANDALM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT SHAW WALLACE BUIDING NEW NO. 319 OLD NO. 154 2ND FLOOR THAMBU CHETTY CHENNAI PIN-6000001 INDIA ITS ZONAL OFFICE AT OFFICE NO. 201 AND 202 L AND T CHAMBERS 2ND FLOOR 16 CAMAC STREET KOLKATA-700017 AND ITS GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR AASTHA PLAZA BORA SERVICE G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781007 REP BY THE DEPUTY LEGAL CLAIMS OF GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE VERSUS DAIJE GOGOI AND ORS W/O. LT. BIPUL GOGOI 2:PRANGON GOGOI (MINOR) S/O. LT. BIPUL GOGOI Page No.# 2/3 3:ANURON GOGOI (MINOR) S/O. LT. BIPUL GOGOI 4:PREMADA GOGOI W/O. LT. JAJARAM GOGOI 5:JAJA RAM GOGOI @ JAY RAM GOGOI S/O. LT. AGANESH GOGOI ALL ARE R/O. VILL.- CHAKALIA GAON P/O. BORHAT P/S. BORHAT DIST. CHARAIDEO ASSAM PIN-785693 6:WAHIDUR ISLAM R/O. VILL.- BAJIAGAON P/S. SAMAGURI P/O. SAMAGURI DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782140 7:MAINUL S/O. MD. SAHED ALI R/O. VILL.- BAJIAGAON P/S. SAMAGURI P/S. SAMAGURI DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782140 ------------ Advocate for : Tridib Kalita Advocate for : appearing for DAIJE GOGOI AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 08.12.2025 Heard Mr. A. Kakati, learned counsel for the applicant. Page No.# 3/3 This application under Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed praying for stay of the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 23.04.2025 passed by the learned Member, MACT No.2, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati in MAC Case No. 2227/2022. The connected appeal has already been admitted for hearing. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that unless the impugned order is stayed during the pendency of the appeal, prejudice would be caused to the applicant. Accordingly, the operation of the impugned judgment and award dated 23.04.2025 passed by the learned Member, MACT No.2, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati in MAC Case No. 2227/2022.shall remain stayed subject to the condition that the applicant/appellant deposit 50% of the total awarded amount before the Registry of this Court within 6(six) weeks from today. I.A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant