Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27167 (RAJ)

ROHTAN SINGH S/O SHRI KISHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10095/2025 · 2025-08-28

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous VII Bail Application No. 10095/2025 Rohtan Singh S/o Shri Kishan Singh, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Majhi, Police Station Nadbai, District Bhartapur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagmohan Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 28/08/2025 The present seventh bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.19/2020 registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 120-B of IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act. Prayer for grant of bail is renewed on the ground of long incarceration and advance age of petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in custody since 13.01.2020, his age is about 68 years and he suffers from various ailments. He, therefore, prays for benefit of bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. [2025:RJ-JP:34448] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10095/2025] The petitioner is facing trial, inter alia, under Section 302 IPC. While dismissing his earlier bail application no.13495/2024 vide order dated 19.12.2024, this Court requested the learned trial Court to conclude the trial at the earliest in view of the fact that the statement of the petitioner was already recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and for recording the plea of the remaining accused persons, the date fixed was 20.12.2024. As per the order- sheets of the learned trial Court submitted for perusal of this Court alongwith the memo of bail application, defence evidence was closed on 04.06.2025 and the case was fixed for final arguments on 13.06.2025. Thereafter, the matter is being continuously fixed on short intervals for final arguments; but, it is being adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the accused persons. In view thereof, the petitioner cannot be permitted to take benefit of his own fault and have bail. Resultantly, this bail application is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /27