Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27161 (JHR)

RUDAL RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./3196/2023 · 2025-03-04

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 3196 of 2023 1. Rudal Ray, aged about 42 years, S/o Rampukar Ray, resident of village- Nabtoltara, P.O.- Nabtoltara, P.S.- Mahauddinagar, District- Samastipur (Bihar) 2. Rahul Kumar, aged about 19 years, S/o Ganeshi Paswan, resident of village- Sangrampur, P.O.- Bikrampur, P.S.- Kapurigram, District- Samastipur (Bihar) 3. Kamaldev Mahto @ Kamaldeo Mahto, aged about 39 years, S/o Ram Lakhan Mahto, resident of village- Bambia Harlal, P.O.- Bambia Harlal, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur (Bihar) 4. Dhiraj Kumar, aged about 21 years, S/o Abadh Ray, resident of village- Kewta, P.O.- Kewta, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, District- Samastipur (Bihar) … Petitioners - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate : Mr. Swami Nath Prasad Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Advocate --- 07/04.03.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to place all the grounds raise in this application, during the trial. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed as withdrawn. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-