ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT BATHINDA
CWP/1873/2001 · 2025-08-04
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27159 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27159 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (216) CWP No. 1873 of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.08.2025 Anil Kumar Gupta ...Petitioner Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bathinda and another ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: None. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition was filed 24 years ago challenging the
order dated 30.01.2001 (Annexure P-1), wherein, permission was not given to examine one Shri Tirlok Singh Riar. Today, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Let the order be conveyed to concerned Labour Court.
4. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. August 04, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2025.08.05 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment