RATARI MAHILA JAN VIKAS PARISAD REPRESENTED THROUGH SUDAMI DEVI v. BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA
C.M.P./703/2022 · 2025-03-21
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27155 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27155 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.703 of 2022 ------
Ratari Mahila Jan Vikas Parisad, represented through Sudami Devi, wife of Late Sri Lal Bihari Chauhan, resident of Village Ratari, P.O. & P.S. Dugdha, District Bokaro. … … Petitioner Versus Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Dugdha Branch, P.O. & P.S. Dugdha, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party -------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------- For the Petitioners : Mr. S.B. Gupta, Advocate For the O.P. : Mr. Vikas Kishore, Advocate ------
08 /21.03.2025
I.A. No.1405 of 2023
This interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner praying therein to condone the delay of 108 days in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition.
2. After going through the averments made in para-3 to 6 of this interlocutory application and upon hearing the parties, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay caused in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition. Delay of 108 days in preferring the Civil Misc. Petition is condoned.
3. This interlocutory application stands allowed. C.M.P. No.703 of 2022
4. This Civil Misc. Petition is taken on board.
5. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of Second Appeal No.238 of 2018 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 28.04.2022, for removing the defects.
2
6.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that no sooner the Second Appeal is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defects.
7.
Learned counsel representing the opposite party does not oppose the aforesaid submission.
8. Considering the submission of
learned counsel representing the petitioner, this Civil Misc. Petition stands allowed.
9. The Second Appeal No.238 of 2018, is restored to its original file with a condition that if the defects are not removed within four weeks, this order will not be given effect to.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2