IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6795 of 2024 ------ Rajendra Kumar, aged about 70 years, son of Late Ramchander Mahato, Resident of Qr. No. IM 922, Rangmatia, Sindri, P.O. + P.S.- Sindri, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Arun Kumar, Aged about 52 years, Son of Late Ramchandra Mahato, Resident of Qr. No.-IM-583, Rangmatia, Sindri, P.O. + P.S.- Sindri, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Wazid Ali, Advocate ------ Order No.06 Dated- 20-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No.44 of 2024 instituted under Sections 452, 323, 325, 307, 504, 379, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant- Arun Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 70 years and he is also the elder brother of the informant. It is next submitted that there was some misunderstanding, hence, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 jointly submit that a compromise has been effected to between the parties and the informant/opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed with the case. It is lastly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No.44 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/