Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27152 (GAU)

ABEDA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.

AB/2486/2025 · 2025-11-30

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010229682025 2025:GAU-AS:16425 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2486/2025 ABEDA BEGUM D/O. ABUL KALAM, R/O. SANTIPUR MASJID GALI, P/O. AND P/S. BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:ANOWARA BEGUM W/O WAHIDUR RAHMAN R/O SANTIPUR MASJID GALI P.O. AND P.S.- BHARALUMUKH DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:SOBIYA BEGUM D/O WAHIDUR RAHMAN R/O SANTIPUR MASJID GALI P.O. AND P.S.- BHARALUMUKH DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A Z AHMED, MR F A LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR A MALEK (R2, R3) Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 01.12.2025 Heard Mr. A.Z. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the accused- applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam and Mr. A. Malek, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 filed by the accused-applicant, namely, Abeda Begum, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail in connection with Bharalumukh P.S. Case No. 132/2024 under Section 117(2)/109/ BNS read with Section 8 of POCSO Act read with Section 75 of Juvenile Justice Act. 3. The case arose out of an FIR dated 17.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner’s sister Anowara Begum as informant. Allegations therein is that on 17.07.2024 the accused-applicant assaulted her daughter Sobiya Begum and also caused injuries on his private part. 4. Vide an order dated 22.10.2025, a Coordinate Bench of this Court has already granted interim bail to the accused-applicant and the accused-applicant has already appeared before the I.O. and got her statements recorded. 5. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that he does not have any objection in making the interim bail to absolute. 6. Taking into consideration the entire facts and submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that the interim bail so granted, vide an order dated 22.10.2025, should be made absolute. Page No.# 3/3 7. Accordingly, the instant Anticipatory Bail application is disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant