Nulakani Nagarjunarao @ Nagu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/6147/2024 · 2025-01-08
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27150 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27150 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`s= ---_ i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA RED CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6147 OF 2024 Betwee n : Nulakani Nagarjunarao @ Nagu, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged 48 years, R/o. Akkampeta Village, Jangareddygudem MandaI, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. ...Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer, Jangareddygudem Police Station, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati. Respondent/Complajnant Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated l'n the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the crI'minaI PetI-lion, the High Court may be pleased to grant him Interim Anticipatory Bail by directing police not to arrest the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 367 of 2024 of Jangareddygudem Poll-Ce Station, EIuru District. Counsel forthe Petitioner : sri KJyothl' Prasad Counsel for the Respondent : AssI'Stant Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitiomer/A4 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.367/2024 of Jangareddygudem Police Station, Eluru District. .4` _I Jt-~
I 2) A case has been registered againstthe petitioners and others for the offences punishable under SectI'OnS 189(2), 329(4), 109(1 ), 118(1 ), 76, 324(2), 351(2) read with 190,115(2) of B.N.S. 3) Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 24.8.2024 at about 9.00 A.M., when the defacto complainant Mandapati Kanaka Durga along with her husband, son, daughter-in-law and her sister-in-law were present at her house, accused Nos.1 to 6 along with some other persons unlawfully assembled and criminally trespassed into her house with deadly weapons and questioned her son about the daughter of one parepalli Gangarao. Then, he replied that he does not know about her. On that, the accused Nos.1 to 6 and others dragged her son from their house by beating him with hands and kicking with legs and tried to board her son in the car of accused No.1 forcibly. As he refused, accused Nos.1 to 6 tried to kill him.
When the defacto complainant and her sister-in-law rushed there to rescue her son, accused No.1 caught hold the tuft of her hair and slapped and torn her blouse and saree and misbehaved with her and insulted her in public place and threatened her to kill them, and also beat her sister-in-law and misbehaved with her too and caused severe bleeding injuries to them. Accused Nos.1 to 6 and other 30 persons together damaged her house hold articles, furniture and car. Neighbours rushed there and t ..,,. I
I _ ____-__:-____-i rescued them and shifted them to Government Hospital, Jangareddigudem for treatment. Basing on the statement of the defacto complainant, the aforesaid case was registered. 4) Heard. Perused the record. 5) A perusal of the material available on record goes to showthat a dispute arose between the two families in connection with the incident stated to have taken place wherein the accused nos.1, 5 and 7 along with others went to the house of the defacto complainant and beat the victim. On a perusal of the First Information Report, even though the name of the petitioner was shown as accused in this crime, but no attributions are made against him. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the injuries sustained are simple in nature. 6) ln view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to consider the prayer of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7) Accordingly, in the event of h'ls arrest with regard to this crime, petitioner/A4 shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself _® z,.-,,,,
available for I'nVeStI'gatI'On as and when required and that he sha" not cause any threat, inducement or promI-Se tO the prosecution wl-tnesses.
The petitioner shall appear before the station House officer concerned, once in a week l'.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m- and o5.00 p.m., tI®II filing of the charge-sheet. 9) AccordI'ngly, the criminal petition Its a"owed. //TRUE COPY// To SD/-U.SRI DEVI / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR #ffG,i_ -- SECTION OFFICER For AssISTANT REGIS I r{At{
1. The Judicl'al First class Magistrate (JunI'Or DivI'SiOn), Jangareddigudem, EIuru District. 2. The station House officer, Jangareddygudem police StatI'On, Eluru (Erstwhile west Godavarl') District. 3. One CC to sRl. K JYOTHI PRASAD Advocate [opuc]
4. Two ccs to publl-c prosecutor (AP) High Court ofAndhra pradesh [OUT]
5. One spare copy CVSS I``~-
HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED..08/01 /2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.6147 of 2024 ALLOWED ;S_€r-t#. F-G&£r; 2 3 rlhRE E®E5 I